Example engagements

How Blixar works across fleets and regions.

Illustrative scenarios showing how a typical engagement runs for buses, vans and coaches in the USA and the UK. They are not client case studies; the targets are based on results our tools have produced on real networks.

Illustrative scenarioUSA · Municipal fleet

Live telematics for a mixed bus and van fleet

  • ~120 buses
  • ~60 service vans

Challenge

Buses and service vans tracked in separate systems, with no shared view of idling, driving behaviour or depot activity.

Approach

  • Trackers fitted or existing devices connected (50+ brands)
  • One live map, geofenced depots and yards
  • Driver scoring, idle time and fuel per km reports

One view of every vehicle, and measured running times fed back into the next schedule.

Illustrative scenarioUSA · Mid-size transit agency

Corridor restructuring across an overlapping network

  • ~250 buses
  • ~40 routes

Challenge

Routes added over decades now duplicate each other on the busiest corridors, while outer districts are under-served.

Approach

  • Directional overlap measured on every corridor
  • Merge, shorten and divert proposals, each with its cost line
  • Revised stop sequences exported for operations

Target: 9–39% fewer route-km on studied corridors, with 99%+ of riders kept.

Illustrative scenarioUK · Regional operator

Electric bus and depot transition plan

  • ~90 buses
  • 2 depots

Challenge

An electric fleet order is due, but bus numbers, charger counts and grid capacity are based on rules of thumb.

Approach

  • Diesel baseline checked against the timetable lower bound
  • Same timetable solved electric, with chargers and depots
  • Evening charging peak per depot for the grid application

Target: a fleet sized to the timetable instead of a 10–20% safety margin.

Illustrative scenarioUSA · Suburban district

First and last mile access study

  • Feeder buses
  • On-demand vans

Challenge

New housing sits outside a reasonable walk of any route, and fixed routes there run nearly empty.

Approach

  • Walking catchments mapped by district
  • Homes and people beyond 500 m of service counted
  • Feeder and on-demand candidates scored

A costed plan to connect every district to the trunk network.

Illustrative scenarioUSA · Private coach & shuttle operator

Crew scheduling and fair rostering

  • Coaches
  • Shuttle vans

Challenge

Duties cut by hand, overtime rising, and rosters drivers see as unfair.

Approach

  • Legal duties matched across vehicles
  • Monthly hours levelled, rest days kept
  • Ranked cover for every absence

Target: around 6% fewer duties for the same driving, and fairer months.

Your network

Tell us about your fleet.

Buses, vans, coaches or a mix. Send us a schedule feed or a fleet list and we will show you which of these scenarios fits, on your own data.

Start a conversation

Which scenario fits your network?

Send us a schedule feed or a fleet list. We will show you the approach and the likely savings on your own data.